I Refuse To Be Politically Correct
Political correctness is the bludgeon cultural-Marxists wield to demagogue the craven into obedience. It is the meme employed that ensures the acceptable form of social-engineering. I reject “political-correctness” in all of its constructs and have pledged to myself that I will never succumb to what amounts to a veiled unconstitutional attempt to enslave the nation on a plantation of forced group think, group speak, and group behavior.
Such was the gist of a conversation I recently had with Susan Highfield. She suffered under the fallacious idea that certain speech was permissible only for her to use. She said: “Mychal, I hate the man [i.e., Obama]…but only a homosexual like myself, can be calling him a…fairy. Otherwise it’s a derogatory statement against [homosexual] people. With all due respect, I’m pretty sure you understand.” She continued by saying, “…calling him a fairy is basically hate speech.”[adsanity id=8405 align=alignleft /]Apparently Ms. Highfield neglected to note that it was me she was speaking to and failed to consider my rejection of such asinine reasoning. I explained to her that “I refuse to have speech privatized…nor do I subscribe to the myth that homosexuals are harmed” by individuals using proper grammar as it was intended because they do not like it.
Highfield was attempting to silence any potential criticism and/or rejection of her chosen life-style in the same way Muslims attempt to detract attention away from their passive acceptance of the horrors inflicted the world over by those claiming allegiance to their so-called religion. It is also the weapon used to intimidate and silence criticism of Obama.
And therein lies the true reasoning behind the idea of privatizing speech. It is about controlling criticism in order to force acceptance of that which is offensive and malevolent.
When you peel away the layers of supposed reasoning pursuant to the application of political correction, it is neo-Leninism in its rawest form. It is the exponential expansion of government and schools in an attempt to dictate behavior by redefining what is acceptable. Ultimately anyone not submitting to same is condemned by the pressure of their peers.
Another thing one finds when the layers of political correctness are peeled away is a level of intellectual dishonesty and moral dishonesty (read moral decay) that is shocking albeit not surprising and certainly not out of character for those who promote it.
Such is consistent with Highfield’s comments. She, like many ascribing to the privatizing of speech, is shamefully clueless pursuant to the definition of the words they claim are only not offensive if used by them.
She took exception to my calling Obama a “fairy.” She wanted me to believe that for me to use the word was somehow an act of hate speech and injurious to homosexuals when used by heterosexuals. The problem with her reasoning is the proper definition of the word “fairy” further exposes her ignorance and intellectual dishonesty.
The word “fairy” as I intended it is defined by the Urban Dictionary as “a male who acts slightly feminine but not necessarily means that they are homosexual.” Thus my response to Highfield questioning whether she had seen the photos of him on a bicycle or throwing a baseball cemented my usage of “fairy” to describe him.
If the conflicted Cartesians trying to practice what the cultural Marxists are advocating were remotely honest, they would quickly understand that which they espouse by definition “fails to apply standards of rational evaluation that one is aware of, and almost always in a self-serving fashion.”
Highfield she claimed she was “disappointed” because I wasn’t “focusing on the fact that Obama is an imposter by attempting to pass himself off as a heterosexual, with a wife and children when its been uncovered that he is indeed a homosexual.” This was the source of her angst with Obama and as she also commented she was upset because “What he’s done to this country is liable to take a couple of generations to fix.”
Yet her angst with me is that I called him a “fairy.” While her angst with him was that he is, according to the information that she apparently has access to, is that he remains a closet homosexual using family as his beard.
I refuse to accept that my using the words such as “fairy, niggardly, heathen, pagan,” ad nauseum are injurious to homosexuals, blacks, and Muslims. Nor will I be bullied into accepting a contrived lexicon that is inherently illiterate and dishonest and serves only to promote that which is antithetical to everything I believe.[adsanity id=11817 align=alignleft /]
About the Author
Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy Research. Read entire bio here