HOMOSEXUAL MANAGERS AND THE HOMOSEXUAL IMPREGNATION POLICY (UNCLASSIFIED)

The following was forwarded to me based on the “INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATION THEORY AND BEHAVIOR, 9 (1), 1-26 SPRING 2006;” HOMOSEXUAL MANAGERS AND THE HOMOSEXUAL IMPREGNATION POLICY by Geoffrey Mark Caldwell.

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Sirs/Ma’am,

Not sure if you’ve seen this research. Page 19 starts the analysis of
results of this research. Very interesting results.

v/r

HOMOSEXUAL MANAGERS AND THE HOMOSEXUAL IMPREGNATION POLICY.

Authors:

Caldwell, Geoffrey Mark
Source: International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior (PrAcademics
Press); Spring2006, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1-26, 26p

Abstract:

The homosexual community has undoubtedly been assuming senior managerial
positions of authority within government for generations, Clinard (1968).
However, homosexuals are now moving more publicly, rather than
surreptitiously into the echelons of managerial roles within the
bureaucracy, (Clinard, 1968, Barker & Allen,, 1976, Wofford, 1993). This
research suggests that this homosexual openness has in some cases created an
environmental despotism where the homosexual managerial minority may openly
and selectively discriminate towards their fraternal association and
specifically against the heterosexual majority. Is there now the means, for
homosexual managers to impose retribution for the chronicled persecution of
homosexuals by heterosexuals? If so, could this retribution be leading to
homosexual managers replicating the ideologies of the “old boys’ club” by
creating their separatist “guys’ club”. Would this sex-oriented preference
discrimination resemble a somewhat disturbing paradox: Discrimination
defined by sex inclination and such discrimination which ironically was
associated with the powerful heterosexual males, and which they mysteriously
fought vigorously and actively against? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From article:
The research evidence point to and is supported by research literature that
homosexual managers may be paradoxically recreating and promoting the
ideologies of the “old boys’ club” or the “brotherhood” which related to the
authoritative heterosexual males, and which they ironically fought
strenuously against. The homosexual “guys club” apparently could be the
homosexual managers’ solution to achieving a consensus of organizational
acceptance of homosexuals generally and in particular homosexuals as
managers. And in doing so, perpetration and evolving of the “homosexual
impregnation policy”?

The research evidence suggests that a discriminatory homosexual manager has
specifically, within one Australian Government organization at least,
created an environment which is inappropriately favored towards homosexuals
and strongly discriminatory against heterosexuals. The research indicates
that the case study homosexual managerial hetero-negatisivism has created
managerial suspicion, organizational distrust, harassment and oppression.

Copyright of International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior
(PrAcademics Press) is the property of PrAcademics Press and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without
the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print,
download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be
abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should
refer to the original published version of the material for the full
abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Author Affiliations: 1Master of Management, University of Western Sydney

ISSN: 10934537

Accession Number: 20417470

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE