In yesterday’s daily rant entitled “Obama Is Vulnerable To We The People,” I wrote that “…the timing of [Obama's actions] are not accidental.” That point needs to be kept in mind pursuant to what he and his minions say, and what actions they take. There is another point that bears reminding and that is he has his minions trolling sites and adjusting their comments accordingly – which brings me to my point.
Earlier this week one of Obama’s closest associates, former czar and avowed communist, Van Jones said that even if Obama admitted to being a homosexual, he wouldn’t lose the black vote. Jones said, that there was nothing Obama could do that would cost him the black vote. On the surface this might have seemed like an innocuous statement, but I don’t think it was.
Obama has deployed his so-called truth squads, which are supposed to counter negative coverage. Few offer a more truthfully and factually accurate, and negative picture of Obama than I do. It is therefore not surprising that my sites would come under the scrutiny of his dark hoards. With that fact in mind I submit that Jones’ comments were not accidental. You see, for the past few weeks I have been asking why the accusations about certain of Obama’s personal proclivities, as outlined in sickening detail by Larry Sinclair, were not being investigated. I felt that if the media was eager to take the word of baseless accusations against Herman Cain, the very least they owed the public was to do the same pursuant to the allegations made by Sinclair. I called for the media to pretend that Larry Sinclair had offered information about George W. Bush’s National Guard service. I want the media to use the same energy that they did digging up Paula Jones’ past.
The media has steadfastly refused to do even a cursory examination into Obama’s past, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t have one. And I submit it is one he doesn’t want out or else he wouldn’t react with such venomous reflexiveness. Thus I believe Jones’ comments were Obama’s way of dismissing the challenges of myself and by Rev. James Manning, who Sinclair had confided in and shared about the relationship he allegedly had with Obama.
I believe Obama was saying through Jones that nothing, no matter how debaucherous, no matter how corrupt, no matter how antithetical to justice and freedom, would under no circumstances make blacks not support him. I believe that’s an arrogant statement, because while the majority of blacks may not divorce themselves from the color of his skin – there are increasing numbers of blacks who put honor, integrity, and obedience to God above the color of skin.
If I’m right, and nothing dissuades me that I’m not, Obama isn’t concerned about negative coverage as such – he’s concerned about negative coverage that is true and potentially harmful. Keep in mind that Obama has paid well over a million dollars to hide his past, and as I always say: “The only reason a person hides something is because they have something to hide.” No one pays that kind of money, and no one goes to the lengths he has to cover up his past, if there were not things in his past that are damning.
How many honest presidents have utilized Leninist tactics to troll the internet searching out what is being said about them and then attack those persons? Obama has employed methods to keep secret his past that would make his communist mentors and Saul Alinsky proud.
As I wrote in yesterday’s Daily Rant: “It is important to know how the political games are played, and just how nimble the White House can be when it comes to controlling the news and getting out in front of damaging news…Everything the White House does every week, from now until the election, has been choreographed, polled, and taken before their focus groups. They are like race cars sitting in the paddock waiting to be revved up and pulled onto the course. But Obama is still beatable and it is because, despite the fraudulent polls most people do not like or trust him.”
If I’m right, we’ll see more of this and when we do, we need to respond by digging deeper and becoming more vocal in our concerns. The mainstream media has proven that they are unwilling to apply the same standards of investigation to Obama, that they apply to conservatives. By the standards they use, if President Nixon were Obama there would have been no Watergate, because the media would have refused to report it.
Consider the number of books that have been written, critical of him and his wife – the books and their authors are hardly mentioned. Do you really believe that’s an accident? Obama can use his surrogates to mock us, but the truth is going to come out about him, and even if he is out of office it will be damaging.