The media refuse, and the Republican Party is either too afraid or complicit (and I think it is more the latter), to call Obama what he is. Obama is a Neo-Leninist Communist, and it is time we not only understand that, but call him that. The proof is undeniable.
People, specifically the talking heads that routinely appear on Fox News Channel programs, are ever ready to argue Obama doesn’t understand the economy and that leads him to make the poor economic decisions that he does. I contend that it isn’t that he doesn’t understand the economics and capitalism; it’s that the American capitalist system offends him based on his true political ideology.
His intentions along with the intentions of the people he has surrounded himself with are to destroy the American capitalist system and usher in communism. This is precisely the reason he has gone to such transpicuous lengths to foment racial discord. Doctrinally he believes that revolution is the means through which the American capitalist system will be destroyed and replaced with a socialist state.
John C. Drew, Ph.D. the award winning political scientist, met Obama in 1980. In 2011 Drew wrote: “[Obama] believed that the economic stresses of the Carter years meant revolution was still imminent. The election of Reagan was simply a minor set-back in terms of the coming revolution. … Obama was blindly sticking to the simple Marxist theory…’there’s going to be a revolution.’ Obama said, ‘we need to be organized and grow the movement.’ In Obama’s view, our role must be to educate others so that we might usher in more quickly this inevitable revolution.” (Meeting Young Obama; Americanthinker.com; 2/24/11)
But Drew didn’t stop there. Drew was at that time a Marxist himself and disagreed with Obama on how to bring about a revolution. Drew supported Barrington Moore’s theory that “a Russian or Chinese style revolution – leading to communism – was only possible in an agrarian society with a weak or non-existent middle-class or bourgeoisie.”
Drew ended his article by saying, “I know something about what Obama believed in 1980. At that time, the future president was a doctrinaire Marxist revolutionary.”
Obama’s mother was as far-left as one can get and still have both feet on terra firma. Her Marxist friends referred to her as a “fellow traveler,” i.e., a communist sympathizer. That is further validated when we consider that her parents sent her to a communist-run high school.
Another key figure in Obama’s life was the child rapist, Frank Marshall Davis, who was a committed communist with ties to the most sinister of communist groups. It is worth noting that it was his grandparents who sought Davis out to mentor and tutor the then young Obama. Of all people to employ as a mentor to your child, why engage a radical communist when they had the means to choose anyone they wanted unless they were communist sympathizers who wanted to be sure their grandson would follow in their footsteps and those of his mother?
It is inconceivable to believe that Obama, Bill Ayers, and his wife Bernadine Dohrn would be the close friends they are unless they shared the same ideologies.
The radical, far-left, anti-gun liberal Harvard professor Laurence Tribe said Obama “was the best student [he] ever had,” a platitude Tribe had previously lauded upon the extreme left-wing radical Kathleen Sullivan an openly lesbian Stanford Law School professor who was at one time believed the person Obama would appoint to the Supreme Court to replace David Souter.
In 2011, Obama gave a speech that at Osawatomie High School in Osawatomie, Kansas. The highlight of the speech, as I wrote at the time, was it was there that he uttered the now infamous words “limited government and rugged individualism [don’t] work and [have] never worked.” (Obama Is Greater Threat Than KKK or al-Qaeda; WND.com; 12/7/11) But what goes unaddressed pursuant to that speech was that communists from every corner of America praised his speech. That Osawatomie was the name of the revolutionary newspaper published by the domestic terrorist group Weather Underground which was headed by Obama’s good friends Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn is of note and provides further proof of Obama’s propensity to engage in code-speak with his Neo-Leninist comrades.
It should be clear to everyone why Obama is using race to divide America, and why he has branded successful capitalists as the enemy. It is to bring about a revolution that will result in the downfall of capitalism. But unlike in 1980, when he had openly advocated for a murderous revolution, he has since adopted the Alinsky model and has opted for the downfall of capitalism vis-a`-vis a political revolution.