The following is a syndicated article written by me that appeared December 12, 2011. It contains demonstrably transpicuous proof of what Obama’s true political ideology is, and it is in his own words from his own mouth. It also reveals the truth about his 2008 campaign logo. Those who have drunk the Obama Kool-Aid won’t believe it, but that shouldn’t stop you from sharing it with them, again. I hope you enjoy this latest installment of “From The Vault.”
Speaking at Osawatomie High School, in Osawatomie, Kan., Obama said: “Now, it’s a simple theory. And we have to admit, it’s one that speaks to our rugged individualism and our healthy skepticism of too much government. That’s in America’s DNA. And that theory fits well on a bumper sticker. But here’s the problem: It doesn’t work. It has never worked. It didn’t work when it was tried in the decade before the Great Depression. It’s not what led to the incredible postwar booms of the ’50s and ’60s. And it didn’t work when we tried it during the last decade. I mean, understand, it’s not as if we haven’t tried this theory.”
Now, if you’re wondering what it is that Obama believes doesn’t work, Terrence P. Jeffrey, writing for CNSNews, succinctly summed up the president’s remedy for the rugged individualism he decries this way: “Americans must look to a more activist government that taxes more, spends more, and regulates more if they want to preserve the middle class.” (“Obama: Limited Gov’t That Preserves Free Markets ‘Doesn’t Work. It Has Never Worked’”; Dec. 7, 2011)
Obama, without question, voiced the most unambiguous endorsement and affirmation for communism ever made by an American president. It is yet another demonstrative proof that Obama embraces communism and that his primary goal is to turn America into a communist nation. Republicans (and quite frankly, Democrats, too) who are standing by silently allowing this Erebusic megalomaniac to spew his detestable and divisive rhetoric to the impressionable and malleable minds of children, are, in effect, openly supporting a terrorist attack on minds of America’s children. It is enough that public-school teachers teach such messages; the children do not need said message reinforced by the president of the United States.
Words fail to express the contempt I have for Obama as the leader of our nation. He condemns the very thing that made America great – and specific to that point, America was great before there was an Obama. It should be a punishable offense to allow him to undermine that greatness.
America is in denial to believe that he is not a communist doing everything in his power to forcibly and insidiously transform the nation into a communist state. It is misinformation for the media, political pundits and writers of opinion to report his actions in any other way. He is a manifestation of evil that threatens America in a way the KKK and al-Qaida could but hope to.
He condemns and attacks the very thing that allows him to raise a billion dollars for his re-election campaign, i.e., free-market capitalism. He no longer hides his Marxian belief of “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” He is the president – he represents an idea, a symbol of integrity and a presumption of knowing what’s right to the children he addresses. What child is going to stand up and say, “Excuse me, Mr. President, but you are wrong”?
Using words like “populist” to describe his speeches are attempts to put expensive perfume on a manure pile in an effort to make it smell and appear pleasant. But even if one were blind, that perfume only masks the smell until the pile is disturbed – then it smells again.
Obama is dividing this nation based on race and economic status. He is preying on ignorance and discontent that he is responsible for creating and fomenting. He condemns those who took the risks to achieve and create that which others also benefit from. He used the word fairness 14 times in his speech, in an attempt to demonize those who have achieved above others. Communism demands that there be income and wealth equality, not based on work or effort, but on a statist philosophy.
What is never pointed out is that the overwhelming majority of people are not inclined to take the risks inherent with starting a business. He simply chants the mantra that it’s not fair for some to have more than others, and it is his stated intention to change that. He is portraying himself as a champion of the working class who will take from the evil rich – who unfairly prosper – and redistribute their wealth as government sees fit.
There remains another question astute individuals will ask: “Why did Obama choose Osawatomie to deliver such a transpicously Marxist speech – considering that he and his ilk do nothing that isn’t meticulously calculated?” The answer to that question is another question. Could it be because Osawatomie was the Weather Underground newspaper published by Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn in the 1970s, or did it have to do with the abolitionist John Brown whose nickname was Osawatomie – unless you believe it was all just a coincidence?
Then there is the eerie similarity between the Weather Underground organization logo and the Obama 2008 campaign logo. There is also their use of “audacity” to bring about “socialism” in America, in the original newspaper written by Ayers and Dohrn. While it is unknown for a certainty who wrote Obama’s “The Audacity of Hope,” Ayers, himself, referred to it as more of a “political hack book,” suggesting that it was a disingenuous feint to the center written by committee. I reference it because language found in “Audacity of Hope” closely parallels that found in the Ayers-Dohrn communist newspaper.
Maybe the media, especially Fox News, should spend as much time researching and reporting Obama’s background as they did reporting unproven rumors about Herman Cain.