Our First Lady: Bitter Harridan

The Obama’s are trolling Michelle around the television talk show circuit in an effort convince people the First Lady isn’t an angry, spiteful, harridan. The truth of the matter is, that them having her do the equivalent of a touring circus act where the First Lady shakes her behind in front of little children, wallows on the floor for Ellen Degeneres, pulls a rope and flexes her arms, is not going to dispel the low opinion people have of her.

There are some constants that cannot be denied such as: putting lipstick and eye shadow on a certain former “dean of White House reporters” did nothing to make her less anti-Semitic, putting perfume in a sewage treatment plant doesn’t change what it is, and Michelle Obama exudes rage and resentment. The Obama’s latest attempt to convince the taxpayers, that even though she comports herself as an Imelda Marcos wannabe without the class or breeding, she is really a nice, caring, person – is like asking rational people to believe in the tooth fairy.

The following is a syndicated column I wrote in May of last year. It covers things we need to be reminded of before we smile or laugh at her act. These people aren’t funny and they’re barely likable to one another, so let’s not be deceived that just because the First Lady rolls around on the floor during a television interview.

In my column “Michelle Obama’s inner demons,” I wrote “[Obama] claims two mentors and two people of greatest influence in his life – the race-baiting, hate-filled, Jeremiah Wright and his race-conscious, bitter wife.” Nothing more need be said of Wright, but not enough can be said about his wife.

Anger and resentment have been her constant companions in search of a home to be cultivated into a more centered hatred. We should be very concerned that she has the unfettered ear of the person who occupies the most powerful office in the world.

OUR FIRST LADY: BITTER HARRIDAN:
Michelle Obama has a deep contempt for white people in America – something she has not been shy in making expressly clear for those who have cared to listen.

Are we to believe that Obama does not share her contempt for the white establishment as well? It was she who got him involved in Wright’s church. Obama was little more than a summer clerk, an intern, at the Chicago law firm of Sidley Austin. She was practicing law at the firm when he was hired as summer help and was assigned to mentor him. Something that is not widely publicized is that Sidley Austin also employed Bernardine Dohrn, who was personally hired by Howard Trienens, head of the firm and close friend of Bill Ayers’ father. It puts one in mind of the movie “The Firm” – only at this firm, unlike the Tom Cruise theatrical character, the star players aren’t motivated by conscience. They’re motivated by anarchy and contempt.

Dohrn had been on the run for years as one of the FBI’s 10 most wanted as a result of her part in the Days of Rage riots. She and Ayers lived underground as wanted criminals for 11 years – Dohrn eventually being cleared of charges by a judge in New York. It could prove to be very informative to research the relationship between that judge, Sidley Austin, Dohrn’s family and Ayers’ family.

Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are committed Marxist-Leninists. And it stands to reason no law firm hires outside of its comfort zone – so it is that the elements came together to meld the Obama’s into what they are today, i.e., Marxist-Leninists people blindly think are liberals.

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

At Princeton, Michelle failed to grasp that there’s a difference between the elitist white liberal academicians and Marxist-Leninists. Elitist liberals look down on everyone who is not a mirror copy of themselves. In her Princeton thesis she lamented: “I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus – as if I really don’t belong.” She complained that whites made her feel “black first and a student second.”

Today, being recognized as black before anything else is the mindset of inferior blacks – she and her ilk aspire to a higher order, that of hybrid Leninist. In their political sphere, they hate elitist white liberals, but find them useful. Case in point: Obama’s czars are Alinskyites and Leninists; they are not elitist liberals.

Michelle’s Princeton thesis was made unavailable until Nov. 5, 2008 (interestingly the day after the election). “Why a restricted thesis? asked blogger-pastor Louis Lapides on his [website], Thinking Outside the Blog. Is the concern based on what’s in the thesis?” (“Michelle Obama Thesis was on Racial Divide”; Jeffrey Ressner; politico.com; Feb. 23, 2008) In a blog post on Politcal Night Train, entitled “Michelle Obama’s Princeton Thesis – Her Black Values Revealed,” the author exposes her views of whites in unfettered and unflattering detail (politicalrighttrain.com; Feb. 26, 2008).

A tape that was reportedly filmed in 2004 during the Rainbow/Push Coalition Conference at Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church has mysteriously disappeared from public view. The tape allegedly showed Michelle Obama hysterically ranting about “Whiteys” and savagely attacking Bill Clinton as responsible for African genocide. The wife of Louis Farrakhan was one of the honored guests. (Americanpowerblog.blogspot.com; “What’s Up With the Michelle Obama Whitey Tape”; June 4, 2008)

It’s widely known that Obama’s wife shaped his character. She was bitter with her Princeton black classmates because they were too comfortable interacting with whites. She anguished over taking on what she viewed as conservative values, i.e., “[going to] a prestigious graduate school and getting a high-paying corporate job.” Maybe that’s why she acts less like a first lady and more like a kennel employee.

Michelle Obama is a bitter harridan – by her own admission contemptuous of whites because she felt like a pariah at Princeton. She found fertile ground to cultivate her hatred at Sidley Austin. And there she discovered Obama, who had the genetic predisposition to embrace Leninism.

These people are not liberals – they are Marxist-Leninists in mindset, belief, association and action. Liberals don’t govern as they are – they govern as Marx advocated and Lenin did. (WND.com; 5/31/11)