Obama's Mau-Mau Warriors

Ya’ know, liberal extremists and their Mau-Mau warriors would be hysterical if they weren’t such insufferably predictable simpletons.

As I wrote in a recent syndicated piece “Leftists Are Intellectually Dishonest,” which posted on this site 28 August 2012:

The greatest threat to their goal of global conquest is persons of color whose minds are and/or have been liberated from the paralyzing shackles of their ideology. That is why they set upon conservatives of color with such rabid savagery. It must also be said that the reason persons of color display such raw hostility toward those of us who have not allowed our minds to be imprisoned in the inspissated mire of resentment – is because, although they will not admit it, they resent our being free of said shackles.

Which brings me to Obama. While he hates Jesse Jackson, and is willing to use Al Sharpton, he views persons of color as useful only to further his Neo-Leninist, anti-colonialist worldview.

And therein lies the intellectual dishonesty that suffocates those I labeled above as minions. They refuse to realize that they, like the persons of color who embrace victimology and despair, are guilty of perpetuating the very racism and conquest that they decry.

Obama has no loyalty to persons of color, despite what they absurdly have convinced themselves to believe. They are simply useful idiots in his grand plan. The leftist minions I address are nothing more than modern day slave hunters looking to keep persons of color on their ideological plantation.

The left has responded with their predictable, knee-jerk apoplexy of such brilliant and scholarly words of praise for the accomplishments of Americans like Utah Mayor Mia Love, by calling her “[a] dirty, worthless whore and house nigger.” On a hot mic, Yahoo News reporter David Chalian was heard to say the Romneys are “happy to have a party with black people drowning.” It was a reference to the Republican National Convention taking place during Hurricane Isaac.

I’m guessing he felt the same way pursuant to the attention Obama paid to the Gulf during the oil spill. And how Obama responded to the disasters in Joplin, Missouri, the Carolinas, and the other areas of the country. I’m guessing Chalian agreed with me when I criticized Obama for ignoring those who suffered through the horrific storms in the midwest. I’m guessing he disagreed with the people who cursed me, and called me sell out, for daring to make such criticisms. Of course, we know he did no such thing.

In her speech, Mayor Love, whose family emigrated from Haiti with only ten dollars, said: “President Obama’s version of America is a divided one–pitting us against each other based on our income level, gender, and social status. His policies have failed! We are not better off than we were 4 years ago, and no rhetoric, bumper stickers, or campaign ad can change that.”

And, almost on cue, Obama’s minions proved her words to be spot on. Unless, of course, their poisoned epithets are to be considered the fond words of endearment. The vitriol of these bitter people who cling to their hatred, and contempt for dignity, is matchless.

The liberal television networks refused to carry portions of the convention that had Americans of color speaking. Can there be any more unambiguous statement of what political party is responsible for that which Mayor Love said above?

If, as Obama said in his 2004 speech to the Democrat National Convention, he would take the bully-pulpit of his office and condemn the vile heterodoxy of his party and their minions. For those who do not remember that speech he said:

Now even as we speak, there are those who are preparing to divide us — the spin masters, the negative ad peddlers who embrace the politics of “anything goes.” Well, I say to them tonight, there is not a liberal America and a conservative America — there is the United States of America. There is not a Black America and a White America and Latino America and Asian America — there’s the United States of America.

So the question that begs an answer is–was he lying when he uttered those words to thunderous applause? Because it appears he was just trying to convince voters that he was something other than he truly is. Specific to that question was his relationship at that time with Jeremiah Wright, who he said was, next to his wife, the person whose council he trusted most.

With that thought in mind, are we to believe he didn’t know of Jeremiah Wright’s contempt for America or are we to believe Wright woke one day and had an epiphany of creativeness and thought “g_d-damn America” would be a great line to include in his sermon? Are we to believe Obama didn’t know about his wife’s racially divisive viewpoints when she was at Princeton and Harvard? And if, as he told reporters, his wife and Jeremiah Wright were/are his two most trusted advisors, how could he not know of their racial prejudice?

Maybe someone should remind Obama and his minions as they are, en masse, using his campaign talking points of calling Republicans “angry and full of insults.”