Transgenders Do Not Belong In Military

April 14, 2025

child sexual exploitation     homosexuality     Military     Political, Christian and Conservative Issues     Politics

Obama came into office amidst rumors and a cacophony of loud whispers swirling about him being a well-known player in the seedy underground of Chicago’s sexual perversion.  The accounts of his debaucherous appetite for sexual perversion, depending upon from whom one was receiving their information, ranged from the Chicago bathhouses (hence the reason for calling him “bathhouse” Barry), to the church he and “Okra” Winfrey attended to the alleged facts of those who insist that his DNA belongs to the hardcore Communist, and rabid sexual pervert and pedophile, the late Frank Marshall Davis – than it does to the Commie from Kenya named Barack Obama, Sr.,  who allegedly made nick-nick with Barry’s mother.

Any honest psychological therapist would certainly agree, coming from the lineage of a morally fallen mother and a grandfather who essentially turned him over to a sadistic Communist and alleged pedophile mentor named Frank Marshall Davis when Barry was just a child, would understandably pervert his social mentality.

It certainly would not take a heightened sense of credulity to reason that with such a sorted childhood and past, one need not reason very long to figure out why he is singularly responsible for not just promoting and mandating the sexual abuse of children, children being sexually groomed by teachers from kindergarten to fifth grade, men in women’s bathrooms, and the conversion of our once feared military into a socially engineered global club of sexual deviants and sodomites – who are sexually aroused playing dress-up soldiers with fake medals on their uniforms.

As I wrote in a syndicated op-ed, August 21, 2013: Homosexuals Aren’t Serving With Honor – They’re Serving As Homosexuals.  This is still true today, albeit thanks to real military leaders who love our military and understand that the single reason for the existence of a military, and specifically America’s military – is too blow things up, break things beyond repair, and when called upon – carry out their mission(s) of defending our nation or our national interests with extreme prejudice.  Also, when necessary, this includes protecting our allies.

It was Obama who changed these objectives by attempting to turn our proud military into homosexual Club Med, men wearing dresses, and joining the armed forces to get free sex-change operations.  It became as if the branches of our military became variant expressions of the most perverse form of Munchausen Syndrome in the history of civilization.  A pattern Biden was happy to expand upon.

As I wrote in a syndicated op-ed, February 9, 2010, titled: “Is Cross-Dressing in Fatigues Next?“:

“Regrettably, Obama is the commander in chief of the armed forces of America, and this is a reflection of his values. It has been said that “the value of a leader is directly proportional to that leader’s values.” There is no ambiguity pursuant to Obama’s values. He pledged to “fundamentally change America,” and he has been nothing if not consistent in attempting to honor that pledge.”

And now – in the what those of us who love America, and appreciate/respect the sacrifices our true military warriors and their families make/made to serve our country, saw military pride and readiness finally being restored thanks to the leadership of President Trump and those now in charge of the our military – see a far-left cretin masquerading as a judge while attempting to usurp authority belonging to President Trump.  A leftwing judge acting as Erebusic fulcrum blocking President Trump’s ban on transgenders in the military.

I recently heard a person say the following: “Transgenders in the military undermines the unit cohesion and lethality specific to logistical problems.  Trans people in the military become non-deployable.  They cannot go to sea, they cannot fly planes/jets, they cannot be deployed into combat areas.  They’re a non-adequate resource for the purpose of military dominance on the field of combat.”

The military is not a social petri dish.  It needs to be lethal and effective.  The military cannot do or be either, with them on the front lines.

Plus, on the battlefield(s) the man next to you may need to become your blood bank.  Once again, this makes transgenders non-adequate resources on the battlefield.

Transgenders suffer from a myriad of ongoing psychological and physical health issues.  Those suffering from sexual dysphoria and the associated emotional issues as well as the permanent risk for severe infections and sexually transmitted diseases for those who have had surgery, compromise mission success.  It is impossible to envision any scenario suitable for a transgender, when the explicit purpose of our military is combat lethality and combat readiness.

Even when considering the watered-down concerns for trans people contained in the following links these people are not the resources our military can depend upon for the success of missions and unit cohesiveness.  Which of the following is there time to attend to during basic training, mission objectives, battlefield and combat environments?

SEE: