How Hard Is It To Obtain A Photo ID?

I don’t know what your tolerance level is like, but I personally do not suffer idiocy well. And there is a pandemic of idiocy and a lot of it is coming from politicians.

Case in point: Obama uses Eric Holder and his Justice Department as attack dogs to establish policy he would never be able to pass legislatively. The current issue is photo identification in order to vote.

Even a person with the IQ of an empty flower pot can understand that there is nothing punitive about showing a photo ID to vote. Yet Obama has Holder fanning the flames of racial discord by using words like “disenfranchisement” and “poll tax.”

There is documented evidence, from the John Kennedy election forward, of voter fraud. There is documented evidence of ACORN groups engaging in fraud during their voter registration drives. There is documented evidence of dead people voting, and well-known celebrities voting in towns they’ve never visited much less resided in. There is documented evidence of cartoon characters registering to vote. There is documented evidence of a person posing as Eric Holder himself successfully registering to vote.

Voting is the single most important civic act a person participates in. Why would the president want to undermine the integrity of the voting process? And what, pray tell, does it say about the character of a man who knowingly, with forethought and intent, commits to do so?

Why isn’t Congress taking action against this? Voting is a Constitutional privilege, and it is a right, as long as certain basic protocols are followed. In brief, those protocols are: the voter must be a legal resident, they must be registered, they must vote where they are registered, and they must, in fact, be who they say they are. It is assumed that they must prove they are a legal resident and that they are who they say at the time of registering. How onerous is that?

People in foreign countries are fighting for corruption-free elections, but here–we have a president and Justice Department fighting to ensure the probability of fraud. One living, breathing, legal person equals one vote. It would seem to be a no-brainer, but that is not what Obama’s Chicago machine wants.

What is worse is that they are willing to fan the flames of racism to accomplish their Leninist desire for voter corruption. Let there be no doubt that when Holder and Nancy Pelosi use the word “disenfranchised” in a sentence pursuant to voting they are using code-speak as a means of talking directly to blacks. And in 2012, we have people who are willing to believe that evil white conservatives are trying to prevent them from voting.

Obama, Pelosi, and Holder try to frame the argument that they are specifically talking about elderly people living in rural areas. They try to frame the argument that it would be a financial burden for these people to obtain a “free” government ID card. Have they lost their minds or have we lost ours?

If these nebulous, elderly people, to whom they refer, are collecting any form of government assistance, medicare or medicaid they had have to presented identification to obtain same. This isn’t the 1800’s when there weren’t good roads and the only transportation was a mule or horse-and-buggy. How do these people go to the store, church, the doctor, etc?

In order to enter a Michelle Obama book signing, it is necessary to have a photo ID and a social security number. Is the integrity of her book signing more important than our elections? Apparently they think so.

We need to raise our voices loud and clear about this. Arguing that Obama is using this as an issue to turn out black voters is only half the truth. Obama, Holder, and Pelosi are against photo ID to vote, because they want and need the corruption to take place as it did in 2008, now that people are seeing Obama for what he is. That said, it’s a valid argument that Obama is guilty of aiding and abetting in voter fraud by having Holder threaten states for daring to put safe guards in place to prevent it. But I digress.

The Obama campaign wants corruption to take place because they fear without it, Hussein Obama may actually have to count on an honest election to win. He may have to actually convince blacks to come out and vote for him without convincing them that evil whites are out to get them.