It's All About Being Black
One month has passed since the election, and I continue to read and receive theories and complaints pursuant to why people voted for Obama.
The most common opinion is that people voted for him because they wanted something for nothing. With that opinion firmly entrenched in the minds of many, the publicly unspoken sensus plenior of that reasoning is that it refers, by and large, to blacks.[quote style=”boxed” float=”left”]Race-mongering exists because there is a zeitgeist that gives credibility to it. The message must be that we are Americans, not hyphenations, and that the colors of America are Red, White, and Blue, not black. [/quote]
But that, in large part, is fallacious because it stems from a flawed supposition based on ignoring the obvious. There is no way for me to quantify what I’m about to say – because there is no way most black people would respond honestly in an empirical study.
The major and most prevailing reason the great number of blacks voted for Obama was based solely upon the color of his skin. They voted for him because he is black. Color of skin trumps all other issues.
If the person is, as Jesse Jackson and others frequently say, “really black” the mindset of that person’s politics is a given. But that is secondary to the color of the person’s skin. Sure there will be those who will disagree with me. But they are either ignorant or in denial or both.
Color of skin is the talisman from which a mindset unfolds in the black psyche. The bona fides of same are then evidenced by speech, demands, and victimology. And while it has become popular for blacks to deny being motivated based solely on color they darn well know they’re being disingenuous, i.e., lying through their teeth.
You put a white boxer and a black boxer in the ring together and 95 percent of blacks will root for the black boxer based purely on the color of his skin. And that would be the case even if the boxer were a complete unknown.
Who honestly thinks the black performers, athletes, and actors have a clue about financial and/or foreign policy? Does anyone really believe people who had to graduate college to learn how to write a check understand the first thing about austerity and economics? Not a chance. The only thing they understand is that he is black. I had a young black professional woman tell me “we have to support Obama because he is black.”
It is my opinion that we overlook the greater problem by arguing that blacks voted for Obama because they thought they were going to get something for nothing. And I say that fully cognizant of the fact that black groups in Detroit are telling Obama that they are responsible for him being reelected, ergo, he owes them. That, in my opinion, is quid pro quo and not to be confused with my original point.
This validates my position on race. As I told a class at the Bob Dole Political Institute at Kansas University: “we will not move beyond race until we move beyond race.” The problem is also as I’ve said many times, that blacks do not want to move beyond race.
They may not like my saying it, but their actions and words prove me right. They do not like my saying that they cleave to victimology like a baby does its mother’s breast, but at the very first hint of insult, real or perceived, their, plaintive, cry is, “it’s because I’m black.”
It’s tiresome making this point again and again, but it must be made until people begin to grasp it and modify their behavior in ways that oppose the retreat from modernity.
Saying that Obama won because he promised to give them something is a silly and thoughtless waste of energy. Those advancing said nonsense at the same time they are asking how to get blacks to understand Republicans are better for them – present a conflicted argument that’s tantamount to a trapezist on a badly frayed wire.
All politicians promise to appease their support groups with give-aways. Has everyone forgotten Bush’s State Of The Union messages? Have they forgotten Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” which was an amnesty give-away to illegal aliens? Romney was pro give-away to college students.
It is paramount that conservatives understand that if the truth upsets people – consider what fallacious condemnation does.
Race-mongering exists because there is a zeitgeist that gives credibility to it. The message must be that we are Americans, not hyphenations, and that the colors of America are Red, White, and Blue, not black.
That is our battleground because every time we capitulate, concede, and/or embrace a position based on color of skin the message that is sent forth is that blacks are different because of their skin color. That is the message that provides fertile ground for nefarious race-hustlers to plant and harvest seeds of evil malcontent.
And as long as that argument takes precedent, race will be the great divider and albatross around the neck of America.
AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM MYCHAL: “Thanks for reading this article! If you enjoyed it, please sign up to receive new articles via email by clicking here. We HATE spam as much as you do and we promise to NEVER, EVER, sell your information to anyone EVER! We will only share with you ideas and information that we feel is worthy of our subscribers. Remember, just click here to sign up for our email alerts. Thanks!”
About the Author
Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy Research. Read entire bio here