Liberalism Isn’t Just A Mental Disorder: It’s Evil

Liberalism, as the saying goes, may be “a mental disorder;” but it is first and foremost evil. Liberalism is a satanic heterodoxy that countermands what our Founding Fathers set forth in the Constitution and in the Declaration of Independence.

People, specifically those who after two months in some liberal dispenser of convoluted thinking that masquerades as an institution of higher learning, are ignorant to the fact that there is a reason our Founding Fathers chose our form of government.

Liberals advocate for the destruction of traditional America. They view traditional America as something that is bad and to be hated. In reality, traditional America is based first and foremost upon the Declaration of Independence. Only persons with extreme mental disorders would argue that great document was/is bad.

They offer nothing constructive to make America better. What they advocate is Erebusic ignorance that has failed on every continent it has been tried. George Kelly in his book on Personal Construct Theory wrote: “A psychological disorder is any personal construction which is used repeatedly in spite of consistent invalidation,” i.e., repeating the same thing, failure after failure is a psychological disorder.

Liberals have come up with ideas on education, but even by applying the most extreme favorable bias to the Flesch-Kincaid Grade-Level Comprehension Tests, students in public schools are grade levels behind whatever grade they have been promoted to. Liberal public schools opine that they need more money to better teach the children; and they complain that private Christian school students do better academically with lower teacher salaries because said schools only accept the best students.

Even if that were true, and I assure you that it is not, wouldn’t public school children that are supposedly in elite academic levels do better? Public school children today cannot make change on a McDonald’s cash register that has pictures of the items on it. The reading and comprehension skills of most public school children are virtually nonexistent. Don’t take my word for it – try engaging them in a conversation about languages, grammar and literature.

The most volatile liberals are the white Marxist trust-fund babies who hate the idea of being rich. I actually had a liberal young man tell me he was angry because he came from a wealthy family and then made a small fortune before the “dot com” bubble burst. I kid you not, this person was angry because at 35 years old, he was wealthy beyond reasonable dreams of avarice. He said that America lacked fairness because he was “white” and at that point worth millions while there were blacks as smart as him but were being prevented from accomplishing their dreams. Does that reasoning sound rational to you on any quantifiable level?

Consider the pride of Boston University, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who (and I’m forced to laugh here because it is so darn funny to say), graduated with a degree in economics. Her economics degree led her to a bartending job, which landed her in the U.S. Congress. But her economics degree has not helped her figure out how to pay for the $40 trillion debt her proposed agenda will cost. Nor is she concerned about how to pay for her proposals. She equates to living in a house; “you just pay for it.”

Has Communism worked in Russia, Cuba or Venezuela? Exactly how did Karl Marx improve daily life for the working class? Mao Zedong is extolled as the success story of Chinese Communists, but liberals refuse to talk about the horrific lives the Chinese people were subjected to. Tell me where Socialism has worked. Tangential to same, I point out that if Socialism worked California would not be the pissoir it is today. If wild-eyed liberalism worked California would not be for all intents and purposes nearly bankrupt.

Liberals have extraordinarily stupid ideas of conservation. But how have they helped the common man. Open space increases property values, which restrict upward mobility for the working class. Allowing farm animals and grazing herds to die because it is more important to save a fish or tadpoles, does not result in affordable meals for our tables.

How does it prosper America to permit open borders? Who pays for illegals? Who pays for the increase in diseases that were eradicated 50-60 years ago in America but now, thanks to the invasion of our shores by disease carrying illegals, have surged to threat levels?

Liberals live in a land of Pollyanna and unicorns but those things have nothing to do with reality. Participation trophies to prevent children from feeling bad that they didn’t win don’t encourage a work ethic. The idea of skin-color affirmative action only insures that the least qualified will replace seats/positions that should go to the most qualified.

Banning plastic straws, telling people they can smoke dope but that cigarettes and cigars should be banned makes sense only to a liberal. Mandatory special toilets that serve only to increase the cost of new homes makes sense to a liberal mind as does the mandated use of solar panels on new homes but what if I as an individual want neither.

Additionally and perhaps most importantly, liberals deny God and Jesus Christ. You cannot support the murder of babies and the advancement of aberrant sexual practices and claim to be obedient to scripture.

The one thing that I have personally experienced time after time after time is that there are none on earth who are more bigoted and prejudiced than liberals. They are the most racist cadres of group think individuals I’ve ever come in contact with. The one liberal I disrespected more than most was the late Alan Colmes. As a guest on his talk show he actually had the audacity to tell me that he knew “better than I what it was to be black.” In other words, unless I was willing to be angry and hate-filled, I needed him to school me why I should be.

Liberal eugenicists claim to support black families and black women when in fact they are committed to murdering black babies and thereby effectually diminishing blacks as a demographic just as their patron saint Margaret Sanger wanted.

I could list liberal failings on a one by one list but it is more efficient when discussing liberal failings to simply point to St. Louis, Detroit, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, Baltimore Washington, D.C., and Philadelphia.

In 1796, George Washington said: “If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.”

For liberals that is asking and expecting too much. Liberals eschew what the Constitutional has set forth and codified, they believe the ends justify the means and for them that entails running off to a liberal activist judge who will find penumbras of emanation that justifies their judicial activism.

After all, why should they be expected to run the risk that the citizenry might not want what they are promoting. Say for instance, punishing a cake maker for not making a cake for a homosexual wedding.