SPECIAL EDITION FRIDAY: These Women Are The Democrat Party

Factual truth is a concept that is alien to those like the Obama woman, the horror sisters on The View program, the congressional Halloween sisters, and Jasmine “the mouth” Crockett.

Jasmine Crockett, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), and Sunny Hoston may not be the vilest women on earth, but whoever that person is, may said person never expire.  Because, it will be nothing short of MMA as those three kick, scratch, and claw, to see who is crowned the new vilest person.

What follows is truth based upon factual history, not something out of fantasyland books such as Nikole Hannah-Smith and her mythical composition called “The 1619 Project,” or the mythical jungle story titled “Roots,” that was written (and in part plagiarized), by the late Alex Haley.  I might add, the only thing missing in the aforementioned books were unicorns and flying monkeys.  Following is a factual history not some fictional writing based upon the lies they conjure up.

Obviously Hoston and Crockett are happy showcasing they’re ignorance, and the Obama woman is at her best crying the blues about how hard it was for her being the first lady. Something not really so hard to believe, considering her pretending to be a “lady” demanded more acting talent than she was born with.  Of course, she kinda’ pulled off the act by pretending to care about a man who derives more pleasure from sodomizing men than treating her with dignity; which may be why the rumors of their impending divorce are rampant.

If liberals, and the despitefully misguided and uninformed were as smart as they like to think they are they would have a better way of showing it.

It is also interesting that the fact-finding and researching studies they embark on are not for truth, but rather for whatever they can find that supports their errant and aberrant opinions. Most of which are based on flawed and fallacious suppositions.

These people have the intellectuality of an empty soup can. My apologies to the empty soup can.  The depth of their historical ignorance is staggering, as they continue to rage about slavery and so-called white oppression.

What their diatribes exclude is that over 65,000 slaves fought on the side of the Confederates during the Civil War. And they did so without being conscripted. They are obviously unaware that slaves were paid for their military service, and some who served were paid more than Confederate officers.

They overlook (and that assumes they know it to start with) that William Ellison was a successful Southern business owner and cotton farmer during slavery. Ellison engaged in slave breeding, which was a practice most white slave owners refused to participate in. But Ellison, who was himself a “colored” man saw nothing wrong with it. They also overlook that in Louisiana more than 3,000 freed slaves were themselves slave owners. The fact is large numbers of free slaves owned “colored” slaves.

They overlook that a “colored” woman and her family owned one of the most profitable slave plantations in the history of America. They also overlook Anthony Johnson, a “colored” man and slave holder, who in 1654-55, won a court suit in Northampton, Virginia, which is believed by many to have ushered in the legalization of slavery.

I could go on, but it’s not facts that these people want. They want to be angry and castigate others for having the audacity to expose their duplicity as I have been doing.

Rather than face the truth that so-called blacks are human beings, and as such they are as capable (and likely) to commit (statistically in greater numbers), the very same egregious offenses as anyone else.  Including illegal aliens,  but I digress.

The “black” intelligentsia came up with cover-lies such as “blacks” didn’t really own slaves. What they really did was buy the freedom of family members. Allowing for that modicum of truth – apparently what they did after they bought the freedom of their family members, was to take ownership of them and put them back to work in the fields and sugar plantations.

But to admit that, they would also have to admit that they are no better than the the so-called whites they condemn. In which case skin-color pimps and cultural-Marxist Democrats would be in danger of losing a secure group of victims.