The Duplicitous Hypocrisy of Abortion

A Pennsylvania man is incarcerated on $50,000 bail on charges of punching a child in the head, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and two counts of strangulation for a Sunday evening dispute that resulted in domestic assault. He is also charged with punching the woman, jumping on her with “all of his weight” and strangling her until she nearly lost consciousness. During his violent assault he also chased the woman around the apartment with a knife trying to stab her. Police did not specify the relationship between the two.

Words fail to describe how horrible this behavior was, but it does get worse. What I have not told you is that the woman who’s stomach the man jumped on with “all of his weight” is five months pregnant.

Jumping on the pregnant woman’s stomach led to the man being charged with “aggravated assault of an unborn child.” I can hear your gasps of horror, disbelief and disgust.

However, here is why I am outraged. It’s because of the pernicious duplicity. Many of the same people who decry this deplorable act of violence, support the murder of babies.

Thus the question: What makes what this man’s jumping on a pregnant woman’s stomach, worse than murdering a fully delivered baby? Every Democrat running for their party’s presidential nomination proudly believes in killing babies. Some of them arguing that the taxpayers should be forced to pay for the murdering of babies.

In my mind what this woman endured is no more criminal than if at nine months pregnant she pays an unknown person, she has met in most cases no more than once before she has him or her kill her child? How is this worst than having the equivalent of a vacuum cleaner hose shoved up her vagina, the switch turned on and the baby sucked out of her in pieces? How is what he did worst than the woman taking pills that literally burn the child to death in the womb? How does what this man did feel any worst than feeling the unborn child tossing and violently squirming as it burns to death in the womb? How is this worse than hearing a fully born child scream in pain as it is murdered by jabbing scissors into the back of its skull?

Some will say this is worse because the woman didn’t have a say in what was done to her. It was worse because she tried to avoid the heinous attack. My reply to them is: What about the women who are forced to have abortions against their will?

To be clear, I am against domestic violence of any kind. I am in no way supporting what this reprobate man did. I’m pointing out the hypocrisy of this situation and the charges filed against the man when compared to indiscriminate murder of babies up to and including birth.

Had he given her money to have someone else murder the child she is carrying, abortion activists would applaud his act and her freedom to have the child killed.

Abortion is the abuse and murder of unborn children. It is unmitigated evil on every quantifiable level. A child suffers no less by being torn from the womb – having its’ skull brutally cracked with a type of pick axe and having its’ brains sucked out, than it did when the man jumped on this woman’s stomach. Despite what we are told to believe, with the exception of the most callous and soulless women, every woman who has paid money to have a stranger murder her child regrets it for life.

The double standard must stop. Abortionists cannot have it both ways. Abortion is no less harmful to children than what this man did. In fact, what he did may not be as harmful because there’s a good chance this child survives without permanent damage. The end result of abortion is – the baby is dies. And in the event the child is aborted alive, i.e., the child survives the abortion, it is left in a tray to die. Something, I might add that Obama fought against laws being passed to prevent, while he a state senator in Illinois.

Who is more evil? This man who jumped on the five month pregnant woman or the baby-killer doctors who leave an aborted alive child in a pan to scream and writhe in excruciating pain until it dies? Often the baby has a body part(s) broken or missing as he or she suffers until they die.

Abortionists are against limitations of any kind being placed upon the killing of children. Democrat Ralph Northam, governor of Virginia supports infanticide. He explained what would happen in a situation of a woman wanting an abortion who was already in labor. … “So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,” Abortion bill 2491 would allow for this reprehensible act of evil. (Virginia Gov. Supports Infanticide of Babies Born Alive After Failed Abortions; Doug Mainwaring; 1/30/2019; Life Site News)

Virginia Del. Kathy Tran…defended the bill as allowing abortion for a woman who was already in the process of giving birth. Northam called the controversy “overblown.”

He is not alone in this belief. As I said, every Democrat running for the presidential nomination supports this infanticide. And no few Republicans do as well. Laura Bush, the wife of former president George W. Bush, supports abortion.

I’m being only marginally morbidly facetious in what I am saying. But, I’m unwaveringly serious in saying that the lives of animals are no more valuable than the life of an unborn child. The hitting, kicking or in this case jumping on the stomach of a pregnant woman is no worse than the deliberate ripping apart of unborn children. Or are we to believe an eight or nine month baby feels less pain as its legs, arms, and head are ripped off by suction machines tearing it from the womb?