The ‘Word’ That Perfectly Defines White Progressives
June 24, 2015, I wrote a syndicated article titled: “The ‘Confederate Flag’ Never Called Me a Nigger: But Blacks and Liberals Have.” An excerpt from same reads in part: “I add to that I have never feared the Confederate Flag. I have always been ambivalent about it. The Confederate Flag has never called me a nigger but white liberals have. The Confederate Flag has never threatened me with physical harm and called me a sellout, Uncle Tom, or any of a host of other vitriolic racial pejoratives, but white liberals, Muslims, and blacks have. … The attention given to the Confederate Flag is much ado about nothing. It is intended to do nothing more than foment unrest amongst ‘led through the nose’ blacks.”
If, as my late grandmother explained to me, the word “nigger” refers to a “low down, dirty person” then, there are no better examples of “niggers” than white progressive liberals. And for all the behind-kissing ignorant blacks whose command of the English language is limited to calling those such as myself, Uncle Tom and sellout, and house nigger, while accusing us of being ashamed of our color – my response is they must be looking in a mirror.
I’m not afraid to live my life as a born-again, Christian American man. I do not need to boost my self-esteem by embracing a crayon color. For those to whom I refer, wrapping themselves in a vestige of skin color is the industrial counterpart of compensatory inferiority complex and the inculcated absence of true self-wealth. I don’t need skin color recognition to feel like I have value.
White liberal progressives are a hate-filled, bigoted, self-righteous, antagonistic group of Erebusic life forms. Their seemly many different incarnations notwithstanding, they are stenotopic by definition, which brings me to my point.
They are easily identified because they are the ones accusing Christians, conservatives and every person/group that does not embrace their paganism of being racists, homophobes or whatever. It is the translucent characteristic that identifies them.
For a long period they were able to hide behind an oleaginous pretense that they were the only ones who cared. They prostituted themselves as being smarter and more enlightened and it worked for a season. They were able to bully and intimidate those who didn’t agree with them by utilizing the same threats the Democrat Party successfully employed to enforce Jim Crow and forced segregation.
Specifically, they seized control of the education system from within and then further supplanted sound educational models by introducing revisionist history and cultural-Marxism. With that the neo-Leninists were off and running. So successful were these pernicious calumniators that they have convinced over 20 million black women to murder their unborn babies. They have created and prescribed an elixir of discontent that once ingested, poisons the spirit of individuals.
Then to ensure that the toxic element is passed on generation-to-generation they used legislation to codify segregation and racism that unlike in the Jim Crow South, is not easily identified because they have learned from their mistakes of the past.
Today, they foment and secure an atmosphere of animus and subversion by pretending to be sympathetic. They form a plexus that operates with a feigned show of concern that conceals their true feelings.
Does anyone believe the governor of Virginia is the lone Democrat actor who thinks of others in terms of black painted faces and the Ku Klux Klan? I would not be surprised to learn that Ralph Northam has family members who were Klansman. You can bet that Northam is nothing more than a spoiled trust-fund baby raised by racist bigots, even if they were closeted.
I did a video perhaps two years ago in which I exposed Hillary Clinton’s racism. I wrote a syndicated article about then governor Bill Clinton referencing blacks as “nigger” and other ethnically pejorative references. I exposed Jimmy Carter’s use of racism to win election. If it hasn’t been scrubbed from the Internet research why candidate Carter called a black opponent “cuffs.”
Elizabeth Warren pawned herself off an Indian so as to steal scholastic benefits from other more deserving students. Why is it that her parents and other family members never spoke out against her lies? Are we to believe that no one in her entire family knew she was about as much Indian as I am a mining engineer?
I once wrote: The one thing Al Gore should know about is racists and racism. His father, Al Gore, Sr., was a rabid racist and segregationist, as was the rest of his family. Gore himself, readily and proudly admits his father was his mentor…After all, male children often want to make their fathers proud, by sharing their ideals and philosophies. Especially with a father who was larger than life in his son’s eyes, which is what [Gore’s} father to him. … [Gore’s] family’s friends, his grandparents, his father’s political associates and fraternalizations, and no small amount of his father’s work dealt with anti-civil rights legislation…His father was his mentor – what close father-son relationship can you point to, where the father doesn’t share his most deeply held views with his son? (See: Al Gore Using Race To Silence Critics; mychal-massie.com; 8/29/2011)
Another glaring example of the point that I am making is the relationship Bill Clinton had with the rabid racist and segregationist Senator William Fulbright. When then president Clinton bestowed the Presidential Medal of Freedom upon Fulbright he opined: “It doesn’t take long to live a life. [Fulbright] made the best of his, and helped us to have a better chance to make the best of ours…The American political system produced this remarkable man, and my state did, and I’m proud of it.”
“What Clinton failed to mention as he served praise upon Fulbright was that Fulbright was a rabid segregationist. In 1956, Fulbright was one of 19 senators who issued a statement entitled the ‘Southern Manifesto.’” The document condemned the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education. (See: Selective Moral Outrage; Mark Levin; 12/10/2002)
Fulbright and his group of Democrats applauded the states that resisted integration and “pledged” to use all lawful means to bring about reversal of the decision and to maintain segregation and Jim Crow. Fulbright and company voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He opposed desegregation because he supported the separation of people based upon skin color with every fiber of his being.
Fulbright by his own admission purposed to reverse civil rights gains and he purposed to do so legislatively. Would it be unfair to suggest that the Democrat President Lyndon Johnson didn’t have a much different end game in mind than simply being nice to “coloreds”? Suppose his end game was to infuse animus, resentment and self-loathing that was so insidious as to go all but unobserved in our very midst.
White progressives have become emboldened in their open display of contempt for blacks going so far as to attempt racist humiliation to the very face of blacks in global settings. The cable giant, Home Box Office applauds Bill Maher’s use of the word “nigger” and other morally opprobrious verbiage in the face of program guests who are black.
And as if further proof of the truth of my treatise is needed – the very blacks who attack me because I’m an unapologetic Christian Conservative who isn’t afraid to speak the truth – not only are forced by their masters to sit silently but to defend the racists mocking and humiliating them.
Democrat Nancy Pelosi humiliated members of the Congressional Black Caucus who dared to voice they wanted a greater role in leadership of the House of Representatives, specifically as speaker of same.
It wasn’t conservatives and it isn’t conservatives who are being exposed for their participation in clandestine demonstrably bigoted racist behavior. Democrat leadership such as Joe Biden, both Bill and Hillary Clinton, Dick Durbin, Harry Reid, and countless others have voiced racist insults with impunity.
Margaret Sanger was not a conservative and she certainly wasn’t a Christian. The progeny of Margaret Sanger is Planned Parenthood. Only Hitler himself rivals them for the wholesale extermination of a people and yet blacks are forced to sing praises to the murderers of their people. To progressive Democrats dogs and animal shelters are deemed more valuable than saving an unborn child, specifically if the child is black.
In the face of the incontrovertible facts I’ve shared here within, I would be remiss if I did not say that I have angst with Republicans as well. Not because they are the racist invidious Mohocks the Democrats are, but because they embrace skin color above truth.
Republicans support crayon colors. I contend that recognizing skin color as having value is ungodly and incompatible with this noble experiment set forth by our Founding Fathers.
I find few things more offensive and divisive than giving attention to skin-color juxtaposed to truth and the American fabric. Republican groups are quick to combat objectionable behavior of progressives by trading upon skin color. They are quick to say “black conservatives” disagree or agree with blah-blah. My question is, why is skin color a necessary component is such instances. Why not address the amoral behavior or an agenda by saying that “Conservative Americans” disagree and then pointing out why. To do otherwise is just another form of using blacks for personal gain wrapped in a different package.
While I’m starting to clearly and tangibly see the fruit of my labor and others who are in the trenches with me, I know we are closer to achieving my dream of a true colorblind society but we still have a very long way to go. If Republican front groups and think tanks would follow my lead, together we could impact America in a positive way. But if they were to do that they would be ending the need for them in their current incarnation.
I am hated and in no small part feared because I am not one for pulling punches nor am I one to suffer fools. I speak the truth and I speak the truth as a Christian. I am inflexible and I am not for sale.
I don’t want to be known as a crayon color. I want to be known as a true man of God and an American who is willing to stand for truth.
About the Author
Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy Research. Read entire bio here