Where Did Obama Come From and Why Won’t The Media Find Out?

There is a question that I submit needs to be answered before progressives and their magpies in the so-called “journalism media” launch one more attack on President Trump. But, alas, I realize that expecting the worthless anarchist liars and charades would rather be struck by lightning than report the truth.

I am specifically referencing the caricatures who strike poses for the so-called cable and television news cameras each day and their refusal to properly investigate Obama.

Has it not occurred to you that these so-called journalists are able to find out everything about everyone but Obama? Has it occurred to you that these so-called journalists count it as the height of “dernier cri” to uncover all there is to be known about everyone but Obama? For better or for worse we know pretty much all there is to know about the Clintons with the list of things we are finding out growing by the week.

The media unearthed all there legitimately was on George W. Bush and weighed upon Dan Rather to make the rest up; which resulted in him losing his throne before the television cameras.

We had complete dossiers on John McCain, Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, and the phalanx of other presidential contenders presented to us daily.

But even though Obama boasts of his historic greatness, the validity of which goes unchallenged, even though his entire professional existence goes back only to the mysterious materializing of his Senatorial opponent, Jack Ryan’s divorce transcripts.

It was David Ehrenstein who resurrected the phrase “magic Negro.” (See: Obama the Magic Negro; Los Angeles Times; 3/19/2007) The phrase has its etymological beginnings in the post Brown v. Board Education period. It is not ipse dixit to state that there is more known about Melchizedek of the Old Testament Scriptures (See: Hebrews 7:3), than is known of Obama even to this day.

“Only a man of magic (Negro or otherwise) could tell the story of a “revelation,” a “violent” awakening, an incident that “permanently altered” his vision,” as Richard Cohen wrote, and as the Chicago Tribune called into serious question the truth Obama’s statements – and thus the integrity of the man. And yet no one in the public or media demands as explanation. (See: Obama’s Back Story; Washington Post; 3/27/2007)

Obama remains the only leader in the history of the world that the people of his country know nothing about. And what is known about him has been shown to be false. The teachers and his classmates at the Wharton School of Finance vividly remember President Trump as a student. Where are the classmates of Obama?

We witnessed nearly 200 unsolicited individuals come forward in support of Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, many of whom have not socialized with him for years. They came forward at a critical moment and spoke to his good character. There were friends and ladies whom he had dated. Obama has yet to remotely have such a show of remembrance.

There have been no teachers from grade school and no professors from college who have stepped forward to address what kind of student he was. There was one supposed to be girlfriend, but that was proven to be a ruse and the story quickly disappeared. He is the first editor of the Harvard Law Review to not have articles published that we can turn to, if he was the editor at all, and there are legitimate persons who question same.

He lied about being a law school professor. He was a lecturer, something I myself have done one time, at Shepard Broad College of Law at NOVA Southeastern University in Florida.

All that is to be factually known about Obama remains under seal – something that has reportedly cost Obama millions. But why – what is it that he fears the public knowing? And considering that much of what he has personally shared about his past was proven to be lies, shouldn’t the so-called “investigative journalists” think it important to have such a “miscreant of mystery” thoroughly investigated? Especially one who occupied the most powerful seat in the world and who continues to exert influence even though he is out of office?

Indeed, maybe as Ehrenstein wrote, Obama is a “magic Negro.” It can only be the most powerful of the dark sciences (pun intended), that allows its practitioner to convince the people of his adopted demographic, that he is one of them and interested in their well-being, even as he advocates for the genocide of their future generations vis-a`-vis abortion.

It can only be that “old black magic” that directed the media to challenge Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney about his Mormonism, and overlook Obama’s affiliation in a heretical church with a hate-monger pastor.

It is either a man of powerful magic or a biased media who are only interested in that, which they can prostitute via misinformation to destroy the fabric of traditional America that causes the media to ignore the most important political investigation in our lifetime. The in-depth factual investigation of Obama.