Examples That Prove Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
It’s absolutely a fact that liberalism is a devastatingly debilitating brain and mind disorder that cripples the individual’s ability to think and reason cogently. Following are a few examples proving my assertion.
Unlike Bill Clinton, when “Creepy” Joe Biden glares into the television cameras and says he didn’t have sex with “that woman” whoever she may be, he’ll be telling the truth. But let’s hear Biden get around his oft captured penchant for sniffing the hair of women and little girls. One can only guess what is going through his alcohol deadened perverted mind when he is stroking and smelling the hair of women around him. But I digress.
Uncle “Creepy” Joe is literally peeing his pants in anger, because Rudy Giuliani, President Trump’s attorney is about to start an investigation into the misdeeds surrounding the fraudulent Russian collusion case. This upsets “Creepy” Joe because any such investigation places his crooked son in the crosshairs of the very misdeeds he and Democrats have been accusing President Trump’s son of doing. The difference being that Donald Trump, Jr. is innocent of any wrong doing. President Trump’s children are not thieves and robbers.
That cannot be said about Hunter Biden, son of “Creepy” Joe. And Biden knows it, which is why he thinks if he screams unfair, loud enough and often enough, Giuliani will just go away and not look into his son’s wrong doing.
The point here is obvious. It is perfectly okay for progressives to falsely malign and accuse Donald Trump, Jr. but it is not okay to investigate Hunter Biden of whom it is generally conceded he is as dirty as they come and has used his father’s office and his last name for business gain. Yet “Creepy” Joe screams how dare they investigate his guilty son. That doesn’t strike me as an image of sanity.
Then there is Rashida Tlaib, the rabid anti-semite Muslim congress “thing” from Michigan who claims a friend advised her to “talk like a fourth grader” so “racist idiots” could understand what she really meant when she made her disparaging and boorish comments about the Holocaust.
Let me first say, I would bet dollars to donuts that Tlaib’s supposed friend was a fourth grader themself, and from a Detroit public school at that. Because any student from even a reasonably good public school outside of Michigan, in the first grade or higher is capable of understanding an insult directed at Jewish people such as the one Tlaib now denies having made.
Tlaib made an anti-Semitic comment and now she is upset because she was criticized for same. That is typical progressive Muslim behavior.
Tlaib said, thoughts about the Holocaust gave her a “calming feeling” because supposedly Palestinians provided a “safe haven” for Jewish Holocaust victims. She claimed Palestinians created a safe haven so Israel could be created for Jews. Tlaib is a noxious gaseous liar. I would say she’s fully aware that she’s lying, but being a devout Muslim, lying isn’t lying for her in this instance, because Americans are infidels and Jews deserve to die. She is just living down to the standards of her false religion.
But never let it be said that progressive Muslims are not as intellectually dishonest as all progressive Democrats. With that said, using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade-Level Comprehension Exam as a barometer the majority of children and adults living in her voting district speak at best on an eighth grade comprehension level, thus her imaginary friend might have a point.
And finally there is the one thing that demonstrably proves how mentally unbalanced progressives are. It is their support of baby-killing. The Alabama anti-abortion bill ostensibly criminalizes murdering children. The outcry directed at this legislation is an epic display of crazed contradictions when you step back and consider the obvious.
If I own a female dog that is giving birth and as each puppy is born, I place it in water and hold it under until it dies, I’m going to be arrested for any number of charges including animal abuse. If I were to take each puppy as it were born, and hit it in the head with a small pick then suck its brains out with some sort of suction device, I would face public condemnation and criminal penalties.
But, what is the difference between treating a puppy like that and treating a human being like that? Obviously these people place a higher value on the lives of puppies than they do the lives of children.
Socialist Democrat governors and presidential candidates alike, have proudly announced that they are 100 percent supportive of letting babies die after they’re born if the parent(s) decide they don’t want them. Yet, somehow making that decision in the case of a dog, cat, horse or even chickens is determined to be cruel. Does anyone not see the Erebusic irony of such conflicted reasoning?
If a man were to have an accident on the way to a death clinic where he and his wife/girlfriend were going to have a nearly full term child murdered and they were involved in an accident that resulted in the unborn child being killed; the driver of the other vehicle could be charged with vehicular manslaughter. Explain to me what difference the baby being killed would make if the mother had already decided to murder the child and was en route to have the child killed? Does such a rendering make sense to you?
Why are the same crazed progressives who are arguing to end the death penalty, not showing the same concern for unborn children? Why is it that of all the life on God’s green earth, progressive liberals view babies to have the least value?
This kind argues for saving seals, saving lions, tigers, elephants and leopards; saving fish, insects, spiders, dogs, cats, birds, saving the rain forests, saving the oceans, plants and trees. However, you will never see or hear them doing long maudlin commercials about saving unborn children; albeit, they will scour the world to adopt trophy children. But you will see them calling for unborn children in the neighborhoods they live to be murdered.
It is difficult to argue with that which I set forth, unless one is a socialist progressive, in which case taking a distorted backward approach to reason is simply being consistent with their mental disorder.
About the Author
Mychal S. Massie is an ordained minister who spent 13 years in full-time Christian Ministry. Today he serves as founder and Chairman of the Racial Policy Center (RPC), a think tank he officially founded in September 2015. RPC advocates for a colorblind society. He was founder and president of the non-profit “In His Name Ministries.” He is the former National Chairman of a conservative Capitol Hill think tank; and a former member of the think tank National Center for Public Policy Research. Read entire bio here