Kamala Harris Would Be Worse Than Hillary

I am reposting the following two pieces. The first is from 2015 and the second is from 2017. I share them to remind you what God spared us from by Hillary being crushed in her arrogance of entitlement to be the first female America president. I share them also to warn you that it will be worse if we allow President Trump to be defeated by kamala Harris.

These articles are as spot on today as they are in revealing what Clinton was and is. Kamala Harris admits to everything that Hillary at least had the temerity to attempt to conceal. Harris boasts of policies that are further to the left than Hillary’s maniacal agenda. She slept her way to Washington and Harris has left a wake of broken families and injured children as she slept with anyone who could help her career, married or not. Some might say that the FBI should check her body for fingerprints of people they are looking for.

I wrote the following November 10, 2015: Hillary Clinton: Embarrassment To Herself – Traitor To America.

Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is the darling of liberal/feminist groups. They have long proclaimed her the smartest woman in America among other plaudits. They would have us believe that she above all other women is worthy of our respect.

But in truth, Hillary is exactly kind of woman right-minded parents would not want their daughters to emulate. She is a traitor to herself and she is a traitor to feminist groups who spew women’s rights, and who advocate that women not permit men to abuse them.

Hillary however, has violated the trust radical liberals and feminists have placed in her and she has done it on a global stage.

Hillary and her husband left Arkansas in 1992 heading for the bright lights of Washington, D.C. and the presidential sweepstakes.

The first national images of Hillary, the idol of radical feminists, that we were treated to were of her attempting to explain away the salacious details that were revealed concerning her husband’s 12-year adulterous affair with Gennifer Flowers.

There was the fateful 1992 “60 Minutes” interview with Steve Kroft where when questioned about the affair she snapped: “I’m not sitting here like some little woman sitting by my man like Tammy Wynette. I’m sitting here because I love him and I respect him.”

There was also the news program with Hillary saying: “I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession which I entered before my husband was in public life.”

And “fulfill her profession” is exactly what Hillary has spent her life in the public eye doing, i.e., defending her husband against the legion of women who have been sexually abused, raped, and/or assaulted by him. Hillary’s career hasn’t been one of public service – it has been one of public embarrassment and humiliation.

When she wasn’t defending her husband from criminal charges of one sort or another, she was defending herself from same.

Hillary’s political life has been a myriad of legal entanglements and behavior that at the very least borders on treasonous behavior and at the worst demands she be charged, found guilty and sentenced to prison for the maximum amount of time allowable under the law.

Hillary wants to be president but she has proven herself incapable of restraint from alleged criminal behavior going back to her time in Arkansas. She is a bitter harridan who has subverted justice and due process. I would also argue that she in concert with Obama suborned perjury in the aftermath of Benghazi.

Many believe Hillary has used her various positions to massively enhance her financial well-being on every quantifiable level.

What parent would want their daughter to be like Hillary? What kind of icon can she be for women? She has allowed herself to be publicly humiliated in the most degrading ways over and over. Is she basing her qualifications for the presidency on her ability to be humiliated or to not be forthcoming about the murders of Ambassador Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, and Glen Doherty. Perhaps she is basing her qualifications to be president on her escaping the noose of Obama’s illegal gun running operation called “Fast and Furious.”

If the women and the causes of the groups she swore allegiance to cannot trust Hillary to comport herself in keeping with their ideologies, how can America trust her to honor the Constitution? If she, along with Obama, has abandoned any sense of honor to the oaths they swore, how can the American people trust her to keep one campaign promise?

While I do not believe anyone could be a more contemptible and condemnable president than Obama, I think the distinction pursuant to same between she and him is negligible to the point of not being measurable.

Hillary should be forced to answer the questions surrounding the ocean of misdeeds, lies, cover-ups, betrayals, accusations of threats of physical harm to people who crossed she and/or her husband, and the simmering questions surrounding her husband’s involvement with billionaire hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein and young girls barely in their teen years who were allegedly procured as sex slaves.

Hillary should be forced to explain why she has waged one of the most ruthless and public wars on women in history, in her attempts to shield her husband from accusations of rape, assault, sexual abuse, and strong allegations of poor, uneducated women who were convinced/forced to abort children he allegedly fathered.

Is this the type of woman that these radical women’s groups want to hold up as their standard bearer? Is this the kind of person we want back in the White House? Can America be certain that the evil machinations that Hillary (and her husband) have been involved in worldwide won’t be used to blackmail and extort favors and preferential treatment from our enemies?

Would we be able to sleep safely knowing Hillary was in charge?

I wrote this piece March 19, 2018: Hillary Clinton: Portrait of A Failed Life.

Hillary Clinton’s statements disparaging American women while she was in Mumbai, India, were repugnant and morally opprobrious but clearly not out of character for her. Clinton’s trip to India amounted to one more boorish jeremiad on why she lost the election.

Clinton accused the women in places where she lost, which was just about everywhere, of looking “backward” through President Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan. She claimed that the slogan invoked opposition to women’s suffrage and the historical mistreatment of blacks.

Clinton sadly continues to reject the reality of why she was trounced by President Trump, which is the same reason she was beaten by Obama. Said reason being that voters and specifically the women she maligned, neither liked nor trusted her.

Her indignation may seem selective to the casual observer but I argue that it is the accumulative effect of her life, which can be termed a “Greek Tragedy.” Only in her rendition, she is the protagonist juxtaposed to same being a man in the original plays.

I would like to think an argument can be made that Clinton actually had the ability to make positive contributions to America. But she chose instead to not just embrace but too showcase all of the most deplorable qualities of a fallen person.

Her personal failing began before she married Bill Clinton but it was as his wife that she was reduced to a shrill, bitter, unlikeable human being. And, I believe, that it is the mental and emotional anguish of her years as his wife, her loss to the likes of Obama, and then her crushing defeat by Donald Trump that has reduced her to what she is today.

I think that while her husband embarrassed her and publicly reduced her to a pathetic caricature of womanhood, her sense of entitlement overpowered her sense of dignity. I believe she felt that her vindication for the inhumane public humiliation she suffered at the hands of Bill Clinton would forgotten by her ascension to the presidency. She would be the first woman president and all of the historical trappings that would accompany her occupying that position would erase the years of shame she had endured. I also believe that is why she so viciously attacked the women her husband had beaten, raped, and molested. She wasn’t defending him as much as she was fighting to protect what she viewed as her right of ascension.

What she viewed as her right of entitlement suffered a huge setback when a nobody from Chicago, whose chief claim to fame was that no one from any of the schools he supposedly attended could remember him defeated her.

But it was Donald J. Trump who put an end to her political aspirations and reduced her to a sad and pathetic historical footnote of what could have been. And it is the realization that for all of her underhandedness, lies, and Erebusic machinations, that she will forever be viewed as a failure that haunts her. I believe it forces her to continue to invent reasons for losing, and to cruelly disparage those she blames for her personal failure. For her not to do so, would mean she would have to acknowledge to herself and the public that she is singularly responsible for her failed life.

Everything that is of value for most people and specifically for women is stained for Hillary. A promising legal career, her marriage, her daughter, her foundation, ad nauseum are tarnished. Even her position as Secretary of State was little more than a bone, to keep her out of Obama’s hair. And she turned that position into a toxic alchemy of corruption that the pendulum of justice continues to expose.

All of her schemes and ambitions have been ruthlessly destroyed by her own actions; and that fact is ultimately inescapable no matter how hard she tries to claim otherwise.

Her blaming her demise on those who support the “historical mistreatment of blacks” is an argument that indicates even those in her own Party didn’t support her. This is specifically because the factual historical record of Democrat mistreatment of blacks is unimpeachable, despite the efforts of revisionists.

As for her accusations that women listened to their husbands and refused to vote for her, even if that were true as she means it – it would indicate that said women actually have husbands whose opinions they trust and value. Which is yet another aspect of a healthy relationship her marriage lacks.

Now, I ask you considering how Harris has hopped from bedroom to bedroom and told lie after lie, do we really want her in the White House? How many men would be able to blackmail her into using the office for favorable advantage to them? In fact, how many are doing it now?