Thursday, October 28, 2021, Art Moore writing for WND wrote an extensive article titled: Harvard Prof: Don’t Give Kids COVID-19 Vaccines! Coronavirus ‘is not a huge threat to children.’  Moore’s article quotes Dr. Martin Kulldorff, a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital who opposes injecting children with the drugs Biden, Fauci et al are pushing.  Kulldorf, [also] serves on scientific advisory committees to the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Moore also [quotes] Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the messenger RNA technology in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, [who] concurs with Kulldorf.  Also included in the article is Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of Medicine, who is adamantly opposed to the point of telling parents to remove their children from any public school that forces students to get the shots.  Advising parents to start homeschooling instead.

These men are not the wacko extremist anti-vaxers the pushers of these toxins are quick to label all who question, disagree and/or refuse to surrender their right to determine the best treatments for themselves and their families.  These men are from the most respected liberal bastions of education and medicine.  Please click the link to Moore’s article and read the chilling information for yourself.

But it doesn’t end there.  Below is an article from America’s Frontline Doctors titled: Study concludes women’s fertility harmed in vaccinating countries.  This article give an even more chilling study of the very real threat these toxins pose to women and men pursuant to fertility.

Personally, I am not anti-vaccinations as such. I am however, anti being threatened and bullied into taking something that has proven life-altering side-effects including death.  I am presenting facts for your information and saying do your homework.  It is our body and our God-given right to decide what we allow to go into it.

Begin reading the America’s Frontline Doctors article below:

Microstructure Technology Professor Dr. Hervé Seligmann, previously with the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, examined fertility in countries that have massively vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to those that have not, and concludes that women’s fertility decreases the more women are vaccinated.

According to the data presented by Shimabukuro et al (2021), of the 127 women who were vaccinated in the first 20 weeks, 82% resulted in miscarriage.

The article by Shimabukuro et al. 2021 presents preliminary safety results of coronavirus 2019 mRNA vaccines used in pregnant women from the V-Safe Registry. These findings are of particular importance, as pregnant women were excluded from the phase III trials assessing mRNA vaccines.

In table 4, the authors report a rate of spontaneous abortions

In the first graph one can see a decrease in fertility the more a country vaccinates, with 3 countries clear outliers, Israel, Mongolia, and Seychelles:

In the second graph, the data are corrected according to the wealth of the countries (poorer countries have higher fertility). After the correction, Seychelles and Mongolia return to the norm, and only Israel continues to enjoy relatively high fertility despite the high percentage of vaccinated women:

Although Dr. Seligmann does not explain the reason for the Israeli anomaly, Nakim Organization Director Haim Yativ says the abnormality in Israel can be explained by the fact that Israel is Pfizer’s laboratory state, and that it must have been given a high percentage of placebo recipients to test the vaccine results against them as a control group.

In the third graph, Dr. Seligmann compares the fertility data of 2019 with 2021. From the graph one can see the declining trend in fertility the more women get vaccinated. At the same time it can be seen that on average in 2021 fertility was higher than in 2019, possibly explained by COVID-19 lockdowns and/or other social factors related to the situation:

In conclusion, Dr. Seligman estimates that fertility damage should soon appear to be even more severe due to the effect of vaccines on men and pregnancy.

“Comparisons between countries show lower fertility associated with female vaccination,” he writes. “This is in line with suspicions of greater adverse pregnancy risks in women vaccinated during the first pregnancy trimester. It is possible that male vaccination effects independent of female vaccination effects would be detectable if fertility was estimated by pregnancy numbers, not numbers of births, over a longer period, as male fertility affects more directly pregnancy frequencies and more indirectly pregnancy outcomes. Data analyzed reflect almost exclusively vaccine effects during pregnancy. Soon, effects of vaccination on the period before conception, including on men, should appear and strengthen the decrease in fertility observed at this point.”

To read his study, click here.

Haim Yativ notes that the births do not guarantee the health of the babies born to vaccinated parents, and that reports of genetic defects in various places have not been investigated but rather ignored.

He also notes that at this stage it is not possible to draw conclusions about harm to male fertility, and that “we will have to wait 9 months from the time the vaccination campaign began in various countries, but already at this stage we can refer to the many warnings by experts of sterilization and/or genetic damage to their future offspring.”

“Effects of vaccination on fertility will likely increase as effects on preconception periods, men included, will become more common, beyond effects of vaccination during pregnancy,” Yativ concludes.